— aka.spvn

Archive
December, 2008 Monthly archive

Windows 7 DesktopOriginally slated to be released in January at the International Consumer Electronics Show, the beta of the newest version of Windows, Windows 7, has somehow found its way into BitTorrent trackers. Whether it was a disgruntled programmer or the one in charge of distributing the software itself, we’ll never know. Of course, none of us are complaining either.

For Windows 7, Microsoft has decided to build upon its previous operating system, Windows Vista. Instead of introducing a whole new slew of features, they’ve decided to make smaller, but yet necessary, improvements to Windows Vista. For example, they’ve completely revamped the taskbar, introducing features like consolidating Windows that belong to the same program in a single icon in the taskbar. They’ve also make changes to “traditional” Windows programs. For example, they’ve added real-world usage to the calculator like allowing you to calculate the number of days in between two dates, or even calculate your mortgage and lease payments.

However, they’ve also chosen to remove some of their old programs. For example, Windows Movie Maker is no longer bundled with Windows, and the previously built in photo gallery is gone as well. Furthermore, the long hated Windows sidebar is no longer present, instead Microsoft has chosen to implement gadgets in a very similar way to how Mac OSX does it (Dashboard). The difference being that Window’s gadgets reside on the desktop itself rather than on an extra “layer”, which is how Mac OSX does it.

All in all, improvements to Windows 7 are welcome definitely, but only time will tell if Microsoft can deliver a polished product on day one. It took both Windows XP as well as Windows Vista before they became the stable operating systems that they now are. However, even almost 2 years after Vista’s original release, there are still many (myself included) that prefer Vista over Windows XP. Maybe Windows 7 will finally be the OS that convinces such people to upgrade to the latest iteration of Windows.

I’ve never really seen the need to upgrade to Windows Vista. Thus far, Windows XP has usually done everything I need it to do for me. Even seven years after its initial release, Windows XP is still a pretty usable OS. With innumerable third-party applications available, everything that Windows XP can’t do, I just search for software that can. Not to mention Windows Vista is a real system hog, for most software and games, it requires twice the amount of RAM to run it smoothly on Vista as compared to XP.

Personally, I’m dying to try out the beta version of Windows 7. Unfortunately, the only spare computer with a partition I can spare is an iMac in Windows 7 supposedly doesn’t work very well in boot camp on Macs yet. I guess I’m going to have to wait for either better support, or a new computer.

Post to Twitter

Read More

Citizendium 1Since it was first created in 2001, Wikipedia has become one of the Internet’s most popular website, receiving over 750 million views a month. Wikipedia has quickly become one of the most popular destinations for people to go to in all the research for information about practically any subject in the world. It’s easily the world’s most popular encyclopaedia, and with good reason: any single person in the world can edit any single article or entry within Wikipedia. What results is what is probably the world’s most up-to-date encyclopaedia.

Yet, along with this feature comes Wikipeida’s biggest and most obvious flaw: it’s, sometimes blatant, inaccuracy. Just imagine, a 10 year old kid could easily edit the entry on, say quantum physics, anyway he wants and no one could stop him. Of course, someone will eventually spot the mistake, though the keyword here being “eventually”.

This is especially so when you consider how false information in the Wikipedia entry on US political figure and journalist, John Seigenthaler, was left undetected for four months. In that time, anyone who read that Wikipedia article probably thought he was a suspect in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and his brother.

Hence, in an attempt to create a more accurate version of Wikipedia, Wikipedia cofounder Larry Sanger spearheaded a new project: Citizendium. It was only recently that I stumbled upon this site, and I have to say, the idea of it is pretty exciting. First introduced in 2003, Citizendium is pretty similar to Wikipedia in many ways, in that a large number of people contribute to the encyclopaedia instead of there being a single publisher. The difference between them, is in who gets to edit the articles. Readers who wish to edit articles and Citizendium must first sign up to be a member. Not only that, members are required to sign up with their real names and e-mail addresses, and moderators even require a bachelors degree to be eligible. Furthermore, before articles are published, they are subject to verification by the site’s moderators.

On the whole, Citizendium places a very heavy emphasis on “experts”, as they are the ones who effectively manage the site and ensure that only quality, and more importantly accurate, information gets posted on the website for the world to see. However in the FAQ page of Citizendium, they clearly state their need for the constant support of their “non-expert” editors and contributors. However, the emphasis on experts might not be a bad thing after all, as that might help deter the same anonymous pranksters who are intent on ruining Wikipedia’s articles.

However, Citizendium is still in its infancy stages, having roughly 9000 articles at the time of this writing according to their website. In terms of quantity, it’s still a far cry from what Wikipedia now is. With a much smaller pool of editors as well, the rate at which the quantity of its articles increases is also going to be relatively slow as compared to Wikipedia, since practically anyone can edit any article in Wikipedia. Citizendium is surely giving up a lot in order to strive to become a very accurate source of information.

How useful and accurate and Citizendium going to be? Only time will tell. Personally though, I’ll stick with Wikipedia for now, even with its inaccurate articles. When Citizendium matures though, perhaps that will be the time to switch.

Here’s hoping that Citizendium eventually achieves its goal, for the good of everyone.

Post to Twitter

Read More

Normally, I’d love to wish everyone who reads this a very Merry Christmas, but seeing as how probably the only person who’s going to read this post is me, I don’t really see the point.

Oh wells, Merry Christmas anyhow.

Post to Twitter

Read More

WikipediaAs the season to be giving approaches and as everyone rushes to stores to buy presents for loved ones, we tend to forget that there are others that deserve our gifts as much as everyone else. Especially if it’s someone who you probably go to time and time again for help, whom millions of other people turn to, and yet he never asks for anything in return.

No, not Santa Claus, he has more than enough elves to help him. Rather, it’s a site that practically everyone takes for granted: Wikipedia. Unless you’ve been living under a rock, Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia which practically anyone at all can edit and add information to. This practically makes it the fastest growing and most rapidly updated encyclopedia in the world with millions and millions of “editors”. Just look at how quickly the entry on the Virginia Tech massacre grew in just 12 hours from absolutely nothing, into a pretty informative article.

That said, one really has to take everything posted on Wikipedia with a pinch of salt. While it is known for being one of the most convenient sites on the net to turn to for in-depth information about a certain topic, it also has the reputation for being really inaccurate at times. That’s hard to avoid, considering how even the average Joe who has access the the internet can pretty much mess around with any entry on Wikipedia any way he likes.

Despite that fact, many have undoubtedly wiled away countless hours among the pages of Wikipedia, clicking one article after another just for the sake of reading up about random facts and information. I’m sure I’m not the only one who does this, considering how 275 million people visit the site every month. Most people don’t realise the significance of numbers this big, but if you break it down:

  • 275,000,000 a month
  • 9,150,000 a day
  • 382,000 every hour
  • 6000 every minute
  • 100 every second

That’s right, on average, a hundred people visit Wikipedia every second, 24/7. While you were reading this very post, Wikipedia probably just received a few thousand hits. Despite being widely known as a pretty inaccurate source of news, it still remains one of the world’s most popular general reference work on the Internet.

Now, while Wikipedia has always been asking for donations through a “banner” of sorts at the top of every single page (which it never used to do in the past), a new banner has popped up in recent days in huge words which read “Please read: A Personal Appeal From Wikipedia Founder Jimmy Wales”. Upon clicking it, the user is directed to this article.

Wikipedia is different. It’s the largest encyclopedia in history, written by volunteers. Like a national park or a school, we don’t believe advertising should have a place in Wikipedia. We want to keep it free and strong, but we need the support of thousands of people like you.

I invite you to join us: Your donation will help keep Wikipedia free for the whole world.

This is the first time this has occured, which means Wikipedia really is suffering from the recent economic meltdown, a fact which really isn’t that impossible. Wikimedia, the organisation behind Wikipedia, is a non-profit organisation with only a handful of employees. However, their server costs must be astronomically high, considering how it has an Alexa traffic rank of 8. While that doesn’t directly translate into the site being the 8th most popular site, it sure comes close to that number.

With such high traffic and with every single user seeing Wikipedia’s plea at the top of every page, they have still been unable to reach their target of 6 million dollars in donations, falling roughly 1.7 million dollars short at the time of this writing. Just imagine, if every person who visits Wikipedia every month donates one cent, Wikipedia could easily reach its goal, with a million more dollars to spare.

I have no idea what better way to get word out about how important it is to contribute to this cause. Imagine if Wikipedia stops being free, or completely shuts down due to a lack of funds. Sure, it’s pretty inaccurate at times, but would anyone really want to see Wikipedia disappear forever?

Wikipedia is there when you need it – now it needs you.

Post to Twitter

Read More

Rubik's cubeEver since the Rubik’s cube was invented and first sold decades ago, it has spread worldwide like wildfire, till the stage where it’s now even considered an icon of pop culture. No matter if you know how to solve it or not, every single person instantly recognises this unassuming little cube.

Upon seeing it, some are continually dumbfounded by it, not knowing how others are able to solve it with such ease. Truth of the matter is, the rest of us who do know how to solve it are continually dumbfounded by why others don’t know how to solve it. The purpose of this blog post is really to let anyone reading this who doesn’t know how to solve a cube know, it is really easy to learn how to solve it.

I’m pretty sick of trying to convince everyone about how easy it really is. There are so many sites out there nowadays that provide instructions as to how to solve the cube, and a plethora of YouTube videos that try to do that as well. If you don’t know how to solve it but have always wished you knew how to, there really is no reason for not being able to do so. “Not having enough time” is a ridiculous excuse as well, as all it takes is a few hours to learn, then many, many more hours to perfect, because all you really need to do to perfect it is one thing: practice.

The Rubik’s cube has also been associated with “geek” culture, and with good reason as well. It’d be hard not to associate anyone who keeps walking around with a cube as not being a geek. What most people don’t realize is how addictive such an unassuming cube can be. Long after one learns how to solve it, the cube will keep him entertained for a really long time to come. Don’t believe me? Just consider how there were even classes in the past designed to help people get rid of their addiction to the cube.

Most people really don’t realize how significant the Rubik’s cube is, it’s much more that just a children’s toy or a simple puzzle. The simple fact that it has survived decades and still remains extremely popular despite the drastic changes in other areas of our culture speaks volumes by itself. Not many other objects or trends from that era can lay claim to a similar achievement in the 21st century, where computers and the media have taken over.There’s something about the cube that makes it seemingly irresistible to other trends in society and is really one of the few icons of pop culture that transcends all race, religion, language, etc.

Really, people do not realise the significance of this unassuming little cube.

Post to Twitter

Read More

Will Smith Gives$122,500 to Scientology

He also gave a combined $122,500 to the Church of Scientology, broken into these donations: $67,500 to the New York Rescue Workers Detoxication Fund, $50,000 to the group’s Celebrity Center in Hollywood and $5,000 to ABLE, another Scientology offshoot. Smith and his wife have also supported a private school called New Village Academy they opened this fall in suburban Los Angeles that uses Scientology learning concepts.

via: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/17/will-smith-gives-122500-t_n_151873.html

will smith.jpgSeriously, first Tom Cruise, now Will Smith. Is the cult of Scientology spreading through Hollywood like wildfire or something? Or do celebrities think is “hip” and “cool” to join a cult or something. Why do so many people still fall for the lie that is Scientology, despite tons of warnings on the internet. It’s been proven that Scientology is the cause of the deaths of several of its “worshippers”, but somehow the organisation still manages to slip through the arms of the law. Despite several movements by people in an attempt to warn others about the harm Scientology brings about, including the famous Annonymous, it seems like there are still people getting sucked into it.

Speaking of Annonymous though, where have they been lately. They started posting plenty of Youtube videos awhile ago, but at the time of this writing, their last video was 5 months ago, and the last login to the Annonymous channel was 4 months ago. Did something happen to them? Or did they merely get tired to making videos already.

At least some other anti-Scientology sites still seem to be up and running, and seems like the people there are still relatively active. Navigate to the Annonymous Youtube channel and look under “Interests and Hobbies” for a list of all of them.

And now, I’m beginning to regret spending money on that crappy movie, Hancock.

They are Anonymous, they are legion, they do not forgive, they do not forget, expect them.

Post to Twitter

Read More

Macworld KeynoteIn a shocking turn of events, Apple has suddenly announced that it will no longer be present at Macworld Expos after 2009. Next month’s keynote will be Apple’s last at one of these events, which is a major letdown in my opinion.

What’s even more surprising is that it seems like Steve Jobs won’t be the one giving this final keynote, instead he’s handing the torch down to Phil Schiller, Senior VP of Worldwide Product Marketing, and also a familiar face at many of Apple’s Keynotes, frequently helping out in certain segments. Still, Phil probably won’t be able to conjure up the same RDF (reality distortion field) that Jobs is a master at, the keynote just won’t be the same without Steve Jobs himself.

Still, the fact that Phil Schiller is giving the keynote isn’t as big of a deal as the fact that Apple will no longer be present at Macworld Expos any longer. You really have to wonder how long Macworld will continue to last in this case, since plenty of people pay the exorbitant entry fees just so they can watch Apple’s keynote. It’s probably the most exciting part of the entire Expo, watching Steve Jobs introduce his latest and greatest products under his RDF.

Also, one really has to wonder why in the world did Apple decide to stop attending these Macworld events. According to the press release:

Apple is reaching more people in more ways than ever before, so like many companies, trade shows have become a very minor part of how Apple reaches its customers. The increasing popularity of Apple’s Retail Stores, which more than 3.5 million people visit every week, and the Apple.com website enable Apple to directly reach more than a hundred million customers around the world in innovative new ways.

To me, these excuses really sound like what they are: excuses. And they’re lame attempts at trying to justify why Apple won’t be appearing at trade shows any more. Just because they have more means to reach its customers doesn’t mean that by doing so through Macworld keynotes is any less effective. In fact, introduction of new products through other means besides keynotes probably won’t have big of an impact, as the suspense leading up to the keynote and the final revelation of the product is probably the most exciting part of it all. New products which were introduced through press releases or their website have never gotten me as excited as those that were introduced at an Apple Keynote, they’re just so much more exciting to watch.

There has to be some underlying reason as to why Apple has decided to take this step. Maybe they’re really being affected by the recent economic crisis? Which is really not that impossible, considering how they’ve decided to keep their prices at such a high level when most people obviously can’t afford them. Or maybe the rumours of Steve Jobs’ failing health (which he debunked in one of his keynotes) some time ago are actually true? The rest of us will never know the actual reason, but let’s just hope Apple will continue making such a lasting impression on the personal computer market for a long time to come.

Source: http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2008/12/16macworld.html

Post to Twitter

Read More

Bolt PosterThe moment anyone talks about animated films, one studio obviously comes to mind: Pixar. They’re hands down the best animated film studio out there. They’ve created gems that will be remembered decades from now, from Monstors Inc. (2001), to Finding Nemo (2003), to Ratatouille (2007). These charming movies have captured the hearts of young and old alike.

However, another big animation studio out there is Walt Disney Animation Studios. Yet, while they’ve developed more than 40 films over a span of seven decades, they’ve never really been able to make CGI animation films as good as those by Pixar. Granted, they’ve only released 2 CGI films in the past, but even Pixar’s first ever CGI feature film (Toy story in 1995) was a major hit. However, they’ve just recently released their third and latest CGI animation film: Bolt.

Growing up in a TV studio, Bolt (voiced by John Travolta) is a dog who has been playing the role of a “super-dog” his entire life in TV shows. The thing is, he really does believe he has super powers and that everything around him is reality, when in fact it has always been the TV crew adding all the effects to make it seem like he really does have super powers. However, when he escapes from the TV studio and goes on a journey to save his master whom he believes to have been kidnapped by some evil villian, hilarity ensues.

And when I say “hilarity”, I really do mean it’s hilarious through and through. Pixar films have always been known more for their charm rather than being funny, though they do sprinkle some humour into their films at times. However, Bolt manages to be charming yet hilarious at the same time. Even cliche jokes just seem funnier in this film for some reason. It might be because of the art style and beautiful CGI animations, or it may be the quirky and well designed characters, but jokes that usually only entertain children are bound to send people of all ages into convulsions of laughter.

Jokes aside, the rest of this film is equally entertaining. The CGI animations are flawless and only add to the film’s charm, the characters are really endearing and there’s plenty of emotion present as well. Though I have to say, I did find Miley Cyrus’ voicing of Penny (Bolt’s owner) slightly under par compared to the rest of the characters. This wasn’t really obvious at first, but after you get so used to the other characters and suddenly see Penny again, there is a slight dip performance. However, this slight flaw can be easily overlooked when one considers the rest of the film.

Bolt and FriendsKeeping in mind this is a children’s film, emotion is a really key aspect as well, and this film completely nails it. It has plenty of emotional scenes, even some that might seem “optional” which are still present, and they really serve to add to the emotional value of the film as a whole. They also really make the audience care for the characters and feel for them, and even manages to make the somewhat mediocre storyline (which is to be expected in a children’s film) seem like an epic story. In fact, during the screening of the movie which I was watching, there was a small boy who was wailing out loud multiple times throughout the film during the emotional scenes. The film has really managed to convey every single bit of emotion the characters are feeling. For example, when Bolt first learns how thrilling it is to stick his head out of a window and his tongue out of his mouth at the same time, the look of glee of his face is reflected in every member of the audience.

The storyline is where older viewers might feel to be slightly lacking. If one were to ponder over the plot after watching the movie, it would suddenly seem completely impossible and cliche and one that would only entertain children, because it is. However, during the movie itself, everyone will completely gobble up every part of the storyline because everything has been portrayed in such a charming and emotional way that it just seems believable. You’ll feel for each and every character and even be able to relate to them at times with their likable nature.

Speaking of the characters, the voice actors have also done a phenomenal job with their respective characters. John Travolta perfectly voices Bolt’s energetic personality, Susie Essman plays the sly alley cat and Mark Walton almost steels the show with his over-the-top and whacky character, Rhino the hamster. There are even a few quirky pigeons that are included to sprinkle even more humour into the film, not that it really needs much more of it.

Does this film beat everything Pixar has done so far?  No, not by a long shot. Does it seem like it’s a likely contender for Golden Globe and Academy Awards? Definitely. Personally, I found this film to be even more entertaining that Pixar’s latest release, Walle (2008), though some might tend to disagree. While Wall-e definitely had plenty of emotional value, this film is so much more uplifting at times and heart wrenching at others. Regardless, this CGI film should be seeked out by every single person, not just children. While it’s meant to be a children’s film at heart, everyone, young and old alike, will fall in love with the film. Disney Animation Studio has really given Pixar a run for their money with the release of this film, Pixar will really have to step it up next year to assert its position as the best animation studio there is.

Post to Twitter

Read More

iPhone gameFirst introduced to much fanfare in January 2006, the iPhone has swept through the smartphone market, grabbing 30% of the US smartphone market share thus far. With the release of the 3G iPhone in even more countries in July 2008, it now has around 16% of the global smartphone market. Not bad for a phone that was released less than 2 years ago. Then again, it does have that symbolic “i” prefix that captures so many people’s attention. The iPod Touch was released not too long after the first iPhone and has already received an overhaul for a second generation iPod Touch. However, little is usually heard about it, since it’s usually subsumed under the “iPhone” category.

Not long after the iPhone was released, it was advertised as a handheld gaming “console” of sorts with entire advertisements devoted to showing of games on the iPhone. It’s not hard to understand why of course, on paper, the iPhone seems like a dream gaming device. Huge touchscreen, accelerometer, vibrating function, microphone, support for 3D graphics, etc. Being a pretty avid gamer, this was one of the things that attracted me to buying an iPod Touch last year (the iPhone wasn’t available here yet).

Initially, the games were really, really fun without a doubt. Racing games were controlled by tilting the iPod Touch, so many games just seemed so much more fun with the touchscreen, the graphics of some games were pretty good for a handheld device (Texas Hold’em). To top it all of, many of the games boasted an obviously high level of design and quality as a whole. In fact, I used my iPod Touch for games more often than for the iPod functions themselves (music, video, photos, etc) and I thought I’d never get bored with games on my iPod Touch.

Alas, the novelty wore off faster than you can say “Crash Bandicoot”.

After awhile, the idea of tilting your device to control a car on a race track just didn’t seem as exciting as before, you realise how badly the graphics are in some games, and even the novelty of the touchscreen wears off. In the end, you’ll be left wishing you had your PSP or DS in hand. Let’s face it, just because a device has a touchscreen and motion sensor really doesn’t mean much if the device wasn’t a 100% meant for games. Games have to adapt to fit the console and the result might not be pretty. For example, a touchscreen is cool no doubt, but everyone’s just used to playing video games with buttons. The accelerometer is interesting, but after awhile it gets kind of annoying trying to figure out how much you have to tilt the device for each maneuver. The touchscreen is infinitely fun at first, then you realise some games might even be better off with buttons or a cursor.

So really, what’s really driving the iPhone’s market for games is not that the games are good, but rather that they seem fun. Telling a friend that you race by tilting the device will inevitably make his eyes widen and his mouth drool with excitement. Let him play with it for awhile and he’ll pass it back to you eventually of his own accord, eyes not as wide, mouth not as wet.

You’re better off with a PSP or DS at the end of the day.

Post to Twitter

Read More

For those who don’t know, I’m at avid user of digg.com (it’s not without its flaws though, but that’s a story for another time), and a few days ago I stumbled across an article on digg titled “Top 10 reasons I don’t care about today’s gaming“. Disregarding the grammatically incorrect title, it seemed like an interesting article.

Among the first few paragraphs (right before the list actually starts), the author wrote:

And just to clarify, this is all my opinion, so don’t get worked up about it (glares at the users of Digg.com… ‘OMG U SUK UR LIST SUX UR ON CRACK!’)

Knowing how immature some digg users could be, I sympathised with him… but then I read the article.

After which, I posted the following comment on digg, which I’ll use here (slightly edited) because it’s really all I want to say:

Initially when he started complaining about how Digg users were irritating for calling him an idiot, I was thinking I’d agree with him by the end of the article because I’ve seen how bad some comments on digg are.

After going through the entire article, the first comment (That guy is an idiot, why was this article even submitted?) needs to be dugg up A LOT more. And so that he doesn’t post an update to the post going “AHA DIGG USERS ARE STILL FLAMING ME, THE STUPID IDIOTS WHO COMPLAIN FOR NOTHING”, I’m gonna try and prove why SOME (note, not ALL, I do agree with some parts of what he said) were utter crap:

(Please keep in mind this was a one-off comment, hence the sloppy writing and pretty biased tone)
——-Start of comment——–
10) Too many good old games
Ok, he has a point there I guess. Personally, I’ve never played old games (I’m only 17), but I don’t doubt some of them are good, looking at how much love some are given. However, is this REALLY a credible reason for not caring about new games? Does the fact that old games are good = new games suck? He stated Halo 2 as one of the “old franchises”, did he ever bother to try Halo 3? Or any other good game out nowadays actually.

Fact is technology has reached a point where there’s just more stuff in games nowadays, eg. Open world games. Sure you could consider GTA 3 an “old game”, but face it, GTA 4 kicks ass.

9) Way too complex

This entire point only focuses on the PS3 (at least that’s what I think, I personally don’t own any current gen consoles, and not because I don’t want to), if I’m wrong someone please correct me. But from what I’ve heard, only the PS3 really requires you to install games.

And even if it wasn’t the case, if the game is good enough, I’m sure most people would be willing to wait for awhile longer to start playing it. So you’re telling me that because you need to wait to install games, you’ll gladly pass on games that might go on to become classics in the future? And only when they become classics will you check them out?

8) Memory cards

I actually agree with this part, the ability to bring my latest save file of Final Fantasy or whatever game to my friend’s house who has a PS2 as well as the game itself to show off to him how cool my characters are is great fun. My only gripe with Mem cards are the small storage space. IMHO, mem cards would probably have been a good idea to add to the current gen consoles. Portability rules.

As for the author, you seriously think you’re going to run out of space because of game save files on a HD?

7) WiiMusic

Do I really need to explain how stupid this point is? How does the release of a (supposedly) crappy game, which you yourself admit was released at the wrong time, contribute to you not wanting to check out newer games? How does that even make sense?!

“Stupid game got released at the wrong time, everyone hates it…. I SHOULD STOP CARING ABOUT NEW GAMES.”

6) ‘Hardcore’ and ‘Casual’

He’s actually stereotyping the 2 categories himself. Only other idiots think that Casual games don’t belong to a “hardcore gamer” library, no one’s even saying that’s the case. Every single gamer (hardcore or not) has definitely spent some time with an online flash game or something like that.

Besides, the logic here doesn’t make sense again.

“People stereotype hardcore and casual gamers…. GAMES NOWADAYS SUCK.”

5) Online

Some games were MEANT to be played online. So you’re not happy that a game doesn’t have enough single player content and you usually only play single player stuff? THEN DON’T BUY THAT PARTICULAR GAME! DUH!

oh and I quote

“Either give me a good game with no online capabilities, or a good game with online capabilities. I don’t really care which.”

If you “don’t care which”, then why is this even an issue?!

4) Casual gaming

Have you even TRIED casual games? World of Goo anyone? And what’s the problem with casual games? There are more than enough “hardcore” games out there for YOU, so now what,

“There are so many casual games out there and I don’t like them… I SHOULD STOP CARING ABOUT ALL GAMES”.

3) Cost

Ok here, I completely agree, game prices are definitely going up, but if the game is quality enough, I’d still be willing to buy it. But for this point I can see his reasons for not liking newer games. But seriously, not caring about games just because of their cost? Good luck catching up in the future when all these games become classics and their prices drop low enough for your budget.

2) Console problems

True, the RROD epidemic is unprecedented, so I can see why you are irritated with the new consoles. But may I please inform you of this “console” that has been around for ages called the PC? Sure not all games run on it, but it’s still a worthwhile platform to play some of the latest, good games that come out on the PC as well. But besides that, surely you can still learn to at least appreciate the new games without actually playing them? Flat out ignoring what are going to become classics in the future is plain dumb.

1) Lack of games!

Someone PLEASE help me on this one, I am soooo lazy to list all the good games that have come out in the last 5 years. THERE ARE SO MANY. He’s obviously not looking hard enough for good games… or he’s just been hiding under a rock. Just a few games I can think of off the top of my head:

  1. GTA IV
  2. Halo 3
  3. Left 4 Dead
  4. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
  5. Fallout 3
  6. Bioshock
  7. Gears of War
  8. Metal Gear Solid 4
  9. Team Fortress 2
  10. Portal

and many, many, many more.

——-End of comment——–

All in all, there’s really no reason to at least completely give up on keeping up with the latest games, you might not like all of them, but the technology itself is something to marvel at. Sure we had Super Mario, Zelda, etc in the past, but even if you disregard the improvement in graphics, developers have learned how to develop better gameplay, provide a more engaging story than saving a princess from Bowser, and have created open worlds previous thought impossible.

Games of the past will always remain classics, but games of today are going to become classics of the future.

Post to Twitter

Read More