Archive for the ‘ My 2 cents worth ’ Category

Damn… why do I want an iPad?

Ok so I know this blog’s been neglected for quite some time. I just can’t find the time or bother to blog much nowadays. The typical day involves 8 to 5.30 work before coming home with barely a few hours to myself. Fridays have never seemed so blissful in my entire life.

Rant…

Anyway, recently got a new laptop, the ASUS G51Jx. Brilliant gaming machine, absolutely terrible computer. I won’t bother ranting much about it here, maybe I’ll post the review I wrote for another site here soon, but until then let’s just say I am sorely regretting getting this machine. Mainly because I could have probably gotten an equally powerful desktop for maybe two thirds the price, and more importantly one that has a BIGGER SCREEN.

1920 by 1080 on a 15 inch screen is way too much. Text is all painfully small for my eyes, and I gotta toggle everything to zoom in. But there are some apps that simply won’t let me enlarge the text (e.g. Steam) and I gotta suffer by squinting at everything it throws on screen.

The solution to this all? Get an iPad for web-surfing.

The iPad was stupid…

The perfect solution IMO, though a thoroughly annoying one for me. When the iPad first launch I was firmly in the camp of what’s-Apple-doing-it’s-just-a-larger-iPod-Touch. In recent weeks, I’ve played around with the iPad twice at Apple stores, and now desperately want one.

Mind you, it’s not just me. For the first time ever, you actually gotta queue up at Apple stores just to play around with one of their products on display. Maybe you’re saying, “Sure, Singaporeans love to queue anyway”. For once though, Singaporeans aren’t just flocking to try the iPad out. At the store in Funan, while I was playing around with the iPad (after having waited for at least 5 minutes), iPads were literally FLYING off shelves. Every single person in the store seemed to be leaving with an iPad in hand. And the majority of them obviously weren’t hardcore Apple fans or anything that would fall for anything Steve Jobs introduced. Most of the people I saw were pretty damn old. You know, the kind who can’t tell a USB port from a rectangular hole. Or the type who couldn’t tell the differenc between a Mac or a PC.

Perhaps that’s what’s so enticing about the iPad. It’s simplicity. The iPod Touch gives off the impression of being a tech-gadget. A small, handy device for the tech-savy, maybe because it resembles mobile phones so much. And older people tend to be intimidated even by their mobile phones. The iPad on the other hand feels like a simplified notebook. A really simplified notebook at that. Why? Because it has a screen comparable to that of a laptop. Sometimes, that’s all you need to do for the tech-illiterate to think it’s really a better version of those complicated laptops.

Apple knows what it’s doing

I guess it doesn’t matter how stupid an Apple product sounds on paper. Fact of the matter is that Apple knows what it’s doing. The tech-savy crowd can scream all they want about how the iPad is a joke, but the fact remains that it appeals to the average consumers in ways no other device has ever done before. Heck, after playing with it for about 10 minutes, I already want one, and I used to think Apple had taken a step in the wrong direction by creating a big iPod Touch.

This goes to show that for all the knowledge we geeks have about technology, we have no idea what really resonates with the majority of people.

Singapore’s development is endangering Cambodians

Us Singaporeans usually think that we’re such a small country that we’re almost insignificant as compared to the dominant West. And we always get excited when we see the word “Singapore” in a novel or have a character in a Hollywood movie utter the word. So imagine my surprise when Singapore popped up in a TIME article, the headline of which gave no indication whatsoever that Singapore was involved:

Is Cambodia Dredging its Rivers to Death?

The gist of the article is that Cambodia is over-dredging (ie. cleaning out the bed of a body of water, like rivers or harbours, in this context its referring to collecting sand from the sea bed I’m guessing) its rivers. Besides the obvious environmental damage, its affecting the lives of Cambodians as well, as fishermen have to go further out to sea to find fish to feed their families with. The reason behind collecting all this sand? Singapore’s high demand for it.

FTA:

This booming Cambodian trade, according to the report, is fueled by Singapore’s voracious appetite for sand. Since splitting off from Malaysia in 1965, Singapore has become one of the world’s wealthiest countries, and as its importance has grown, so, too, has the country. According to Global Witness, since the 1960s, the island of Singapore has increased its size by 22%, or 130 square kilometers (50 miles), and the country has plans to expand at least another 50 square kilometers (20 miles). This has made Singapore one of the world’s biggest importers of sand. After Indonesia, Malaysia and Vietnam limited or banned sand exports because of the environmental impact of dredging, Singapore has increasingly relied on Cambodia, the report says.

Even more damn-ing stuff:

The result has been “ecologically and socially devastating,” says the Global Witness report. The NGO accuses Singapore of “hypocrisy on a grand scale” for presenting itself as a leader on green issues — even hosting the World Cities Summit with the theme of “Liveable and Sustainable Cities of the Future” — while burying its head in the sand, so to speak, and ignoring the environmental consequences in Cambodia. In a statement released on Tuesday, the Singaporean Ministry of National Development countered, “The report suggests that the Singapore government seeks to import sand without due regard to the laws or environmental impact of the source country, in this case, Cambodia. This is not true. We are committed to the protection of the global environment, and we do not condone the illegal export or smuggling of sand.” The statement added that sand is supplied by private entities that are contractually obliged not to cause adverse impact to the environment of the source country and must comply with its laws.

While Singapore sure wants to make sure that all regulations are upheld on her end, there’s little check and balance on the Cambodians’ side. It is Cambodia after all. The article goes on to elaborate on how the figures of the amount of sand exported that are reported by the government over there are purported by an NGO to be way too low to be accurate. It’s China’s Great Leap Forward all over again, except this time it’s the government itself who’s reporting false figures.

Sigh, why must it come to this

I’m not an environmentalist by any sense of the word. I’m one of those who, from time to time, forget to switch of lights and fans when I’m not using them. The main reason why this article even caught my attention is due to Singapore’s involvement in this whole fiasco. It’s just plain unpleasant to know that your country is harming the environment and the lives of others, regardless of the reasons. Now, come to think about it, with the number of civilian casualties rising and the many other ways in which Iraq and Afghanistan have been affected, I can’t begin to imagine how the average American feels; what with the War on Terror and everything.

It’s unfortunate that so much harm has to come out of exporting a seemingly insignificant thing. Singapore’s appetite for sand isn’t going to abate anytime soon, and I highly doubt Cambodia will stop exporting it anytime soon. With a profit-driven private company acting as the middle man for this transaction, this situation can only go from bad to worse in my opinion.

The world is f**ked up

When you’re a kid and you keep hearing the grown-ups around you going “The world sucks!”, you usually have no idea why they say so. But this case here is probably one of those reasons why. Under the circumstances, there’s really no easy way to diffuse the situation. The Cambodian political system isn’t going to change any time soon. As Singapore continues to expand by reclaiming more land and developing the IR and Sentosa, you can’t blame the government for needing so much sand. And it’s not like there’s an easily available alternative to Cambodia after Indonesia banned sand exports 3 years ago.

Yet, with so many problems and with so much at stake here, there’s little doubt to me that this story is going to get swept under the carpet very soon and everyone’s going to forget about it. Heck, even the Haiti earthquake which killed thousands of people just 4 months ago has more or less been forgotten by the mass media by now. Let alone the environment and a couple of fishermen from a developing country.

Why do we even care so much about Jack Neo?

Seriously. Why is EVERYONE talking about him in Singapore. He had a couple of affairs (OK so maybe “a couple” isn’t the most apt way to describe about a dozen affairs, but what’s the difference?), so what, big deal. Celebrities all over the world have affairs all the time, and they aren’t as hotly discussed as Jack Neo’s latest endeavours. At most, you get a message from a friend going “Hey did you hear?! Tiger Woods had an affair!” You’d raise an eyebrow or so and get on with your day.

With Jack Neo, you gotta listen to everyone talk about him all week long…

“It’s just a publicity stunt! For his latest movie “Being Human” because his marketing came together and figured that the best way to get word out about how bad his latest movie is (as per usual) is for him to announce he has an affair even if he didn’t have one!”

“Feng shui master offers advice to Jack Neo on how to resolve these scandals! Because he’s busy figuring out how many women he needs to have affairs with for it to be considered auspicious!”

The Media: “Jack Neo closes affair saga with dramatic news conference! Only we’re going to report about the whole saga the next day AGAIN! Only this time, we’re reporting about how the parliament is concerned about the manner in which we’re reporting this saga! Yes! Parliament is discussing about a celeb’s sex scandals!”

GET A HOLD OF YOURSELVES SINGAPORE.

Jack Neo is just a pompous director whose only decent movies are either a decade old or recent comedies comedy that relied on slapstick more than anything else. I (regretfully) went to watch Being Human before the whole saga even began, and Neo has really reached a new low with it. In fact, reports are coming in that it might not even make the S$2.5 million required for it to just break even. That’s just sad.

And just hours ago an actress who I’ve never heard of before (granted I don’t exactly know many local celebs) has made a police report, claiming that Jack Neo sexually harrassed her. Will this Jack Neo thing ever just go away…

I think it really goes to show how bored Singaporeans are. Even the slight whiff of a scandal brewing somewhere is enough to get everyone excited enough to stop sitting around picking their noses all day long I guess. But seriously, how utterly bored do we have to be as a nation for everyone to get excited over the idea of someone (who doesn’t even matter all that much I might add) having an affair. No Singaporean even cared when Tiger Woods (who might I remind you is one of the most iconic athletes in history) had an affair, but suddenly when Jack Neo’s story comes out it becomes the talk of the town. Compared to Woods, he’s nothing. Yet he’s receiving more media attention than he’s ever had.

Lesson learnt: To get famous, make love, not movies.

I can just picture next week’s headlines:

JACK NEO HAS DIARRHEA, LET’S DISCUSS!

Oh come on…

Avatar: Most Awesome Movie Ever

Avatar-Teaser-Poster.jpgSo James Cameron’s long awaited film Avatar finally hit my local cinemas yesterday and in my opinion, it lives up to all the hype that had been buzzing around long before the movie was released. For so many reasons.

For those who don’t know what Avatar is, I highly suggest you go wiki it and read up on it. It’s definitely one for the books.

So why is it so awesome? First and foremost is probably the world of Pandora itself.

After watching the movie, it struck me that Avatar in 2009 is similar to what Star Wars was to 1977, except on a much smaller scale. Both universes were the brainchilds of 2 indviduals, James Cameron and George Lucas respectively of course. However, Avatar’s new universe is on a much smaller scale than Star Wars, because while Star Wars literally creates an entire universe, Avatar only depicts a single fictional planet. However, what this movie lacks in breadth, it more than makes up for in it’s depth.

In Star Wars, the universe isn’t very closely explored. Much of what the world is like is left to the audience’s imagination (hence the Extended Universe of books/comics/games/etc.). On the other hand, the world of Pandora is completely fleshed out, every single detail is explored and there are so many little touches that makes Pandora feel like a real place. It’s amazing how much painstaking work the graphics artists had to go through to create each and every frame of the movie, because there’s so much detail in each and every frame of the movie that I kept wishing I could pause the movie in between just to admire a particular scene. Everything from the colours of the jungle, to the creatures to the flora all around is just stunning to look at. Words really can’t describe the beauty of the world of Pandora and you really have to see it to understand the feeling that anyone who watches this movie will get.

Now the 3D technology is just amazing. It’s partly due to the way each frame is designed I guess, because everything just pops in 3D. There’re ambient particles in certain scenes that truly do seem to be floating around right in front of your face, and every time there’s a rear shot of one of the Na’vi, I felt like tugging at their tails. I never thought it’d be possible to create a movie that uses 3D technology that isn’t in the style of a Pixar film, but Cameron really managed to pull it off spectacularly.

Is this the greatest movie ever made? Not really. To me there are pacing issues and the story isn’t that great. The third act of the movie seemed to drag on for ages and I kept wanting the plot to just move along. Yet, even when it was getting slow, I was still in awe the entire time I was watching the screen. The story on the other hand is pretty ‘meh’.

Go see this movie while you have the chance to. Go watch it in the cinemas because that’s the only way to experience it properly, and watch it in 3D. You won’t regret it this one time.

Review of Rising Card (iPhone App)

Rising Card.pngSo I saw the app Rising Card make it to the “What’s Hot” list on the iTunes App Store and thought the description of the application sounded pretty cool. For those who don’t know, Rising Card is a magic application for the iPhone and iPod Touch, created by magician Chris Kenner. For those who dabble a little into magic, you’ll understand what I mean when I say that this guy invented Threefly (coin trick) and the Sybil cut (card flourish). For those who don’t give a crap about magic, meaning the only name you know in magic is David Copperfield, well this guy has been David Copperfield’s executive producer for the last 16 years. Seriously.

Obviously, this guy is no small-time magician. But I still wanted a few opinions on what the app was like or at least a hint as to how it worked (set-up time, difficulty, etc.) but I couldn’t find a single thing about it. Just official video demonstrations about the app which aren’t exactly the most reliable source. Besides, they didn’t even provide much useful information. Regardless, I eventually got it, hoping that it’d be good. Boy was I not disappointed.

For those of you who’re hear searching for the secret to Rising Card app, you’re in the wrong place. I’m not going to give out the secret. I hope no one does. This blog post is more for people who are thinking about getting this app but aren’t quite sure yet.

Anyway, on to the app. For those who don’t know the effect, I’ll briefly describe it here. Spectator thinks of any card (or chooses a card out of a deck, etc.) and tells you. You then take out your iPhone (or iPod Touch), unlock it, open the Rising Card app upon which you should see a hand holding a deck of cards face up. From here, you can either shake it yourself or hand it over to the spectator and tell him to shake your device. Either way, the named card will rise out of the deck.

It’s a really simple effect, but still pretty mind blowing. I’ve been pretty busy with school stuff recently, so I haven’t used this app with a particular routine or with any form of presentation yet (my bad, I know). But I’ve been getting pretty good reactions. Just to be clear, all I do is tell someone to name any card, I then take out my iPod Touch, open the app and hand it to them, tell them to shake it, and they’ll see their card rise out. Simple as that. I’ve gotten all kinds of reaction. A few of them smirked or sat there in (stunned) silence before asking how it was done. Most of them were completely shocked when they saw it rise out of the deck (I did not tell them what to expect beforehand), their jaws just dropped and they stared at me with huge eyes asking how the hell I did it. Then there are those who just freak out when they see the card. One of my friends almost tossed my iPod onto the table as if it were burning him. Not to mention he enquired as to how I did it with a significant number of expletives. All in all, I’ve gotten really good reactions for a trick that I never practiced beforehand and didn’t even bother to add ANY presentation whatsoever to the effect itself (please don’t do that :( )

Anyway there are certain limitations that anyone considering purchasing this application might want to know. First, you have to know the card (either they tell you, or force, or they pick a card and show you, etc. you get my point). One more thing is that really observant spectators might notice something amiss, but whether that happens really comes down to how well you’re able to present the trick. Other than that, I can’t really think of other limitations.

The trick itself is really easy learn and requires little practice to master the moves themselves. How you present it is obviously a different thing altogether. Even if people spot the secret move you’re making, they can take your iPhone and try it out for themselves and even if they copy your actions it won’t work for them (that happened to me once, it’s when I realised how awesome this app is). The sacred rule of magic that states “never do the same trick twice” can actually be bent slightly, at least from my experience. I’ve done this trick five to ten times on one of my friends and she never could figure out how I did it even when I did it in slow motion without any patter. Even for say groups of five people I can do this trick at least twice without them realising how I did it. In fact I’d think doing this trick at least two or more times makes it more effective because then spectators will stop thinking that you somehow set it up the first time. Yes, this trick is that strong.

Rising Card 2.jpgThe unfortunate thing about a magic app on the iPhone is that people automatically think you’re cheating the moment you pull out something that has a computer in it. Even if they don’t figure out the secret to the Rising Card app they’ll just chalk it up as you doing something fishy with a device. Unlike sleight of hand or even gimmicks where their brains just can’t think of any logical explanation for a trick. However, as far as iPhone magic apps go, this is most probably the best one out there right now.

Kanye West ain’t too bright

So he interrupts Taylor Swift’s acceptance speech at the MTV awards, being completely disrespectful to her. I’d like to thank him for that. He has created one of the most popular catch phrases/memes for the rest of us to use. I mean, just take for example some of the stuff that’s been coming up:

kanye west 1.jpgkanye west 2.png

Pure genius.

Well, now even Obama thinks he’s a jackass. I’m not kidding, he made an off-the-record comment calling Kanye West a jackass. You gotta be pretty screwed up to have the President of the United States think you’re a jackass. And this is just a celebrity we’re talking about here. The President deals with things like terrorists, but he chooses to call Kanye West a jackass. :)

At first, I thought he was just drunk and high when he interrupted her. But he just went on Jay Leno’s new show not too long ago, and apologised. Well if you could call it an apology that is. This is part of what he said:

“It was just very rude, period,” West added. “I’d like to apologize to her in person.”

So far so good.

Leno brought back the subject of West’s late mother and asked him what she would have thought about the incident. West gave a good 20 seconds of pause before saying “Obviously, I deal with hurt, and so many celebrities, they never take the time off, and I never took the time off, really. I’ve really never taken the time off. It’s been music after music and tour after tour. And I’m just ashamed my hurt caused someone else hurt.”

Wait whut???

“Obviously, I deal with hurt, and so many celebrities, they never take the time off, and I never took the time off, really. I’ve really never taken the time off. It’s been music after music and tour after tour. And I’m just ashamed my hurt caused someone else hurt.”

What in the world is he trying to say?

“I deal with hurt” – err, do you always get stabbed or something?

“and so many celebrities, they never take the time off” – what does that have got to do with this “hurt” you speak of?

“I never took the time off… tour after tour” – therefore… you need to interrupt her speech?

“I’m just ashamed my hurt caused someone else hurt” – WHAT IS THIS “HURT”? Is it a code word?

Video of the interview below:

On the USA Healthcare Reform

Obama Health CareI’m going to admit I don’t know ALL the details about the new Obama bill. However, I’m getting increasingly furious as I continue to listen to those who oppose this bill even though I’m not even from the USA. Most of the arguments they give are downright ridiculous and in some ways insulting.

Obama VS. Hitler – cutting healthcare expenditure VS Holocaust

First, they compare Obama to Hitler.

I am absolutely appalled by this. Do they have ANY IDEA what Hitler stands for? In case you haven’t heard of people like Anne Frank, Jews back then had to hide in secrecy, for if they were found by the Nazis, THEY WOULD BE KILLED. Many of the people who are against this bill claim that Obama’s cutting of Medicare expenditure by $500 billion over 10 years is the same as him employing Hitler’s “Final Solution” to purge all Jews.

Are they out of their minds?

First, part of this $500 billion that is going to be cut is going to come from reducing inefficiencies within Medicare itself, for example switching to electronic medical records which would facilitate easy sharing of patients’ information. Of course, doing stuff like that isn’t going to save $500 billion, and the funds for medicare will definitely be lesser than previously. BUT, does that mean having lesser funds for healthcare makes Obama another Hitler?

For those who don’t know, back during the 1930s and 1940s, Jews were all thrown into ghettos in Germany where they literally rotted to death. Later, Hitler’s Nazi party went around rounding up Jews as if they were sheep, after which they were separated into two groups of people: those who would go to labour camps, and those who would go to the gas chambers to be “exterminated”. For those who went to the labour camp, nobody cared when they would die. For those who were immediately sent to the gas chambers, they would all be packed into a room until there was absolutely no space in the room, after which the doors were closed and toxic gases were fed into the room. After awhile, the doors would be opened, and all of them would still be in their original standing positions, all packed together.

Only difference? They weren’t breathing anymore.

People are comparing THIS to Obama cutting $500 billion dollars from Medicare.

And let’s not forget the Holocaust isn’t Hitler’s only claim to fame, this following quote not from myself, and I’m not exactly sure whose story it is:

My mom was born in Germany in 1941. When she was 4, a group of SS officers showed up at the front door of a two-story flat where she lived. Two of them went downstairs, and two of them went upstairs where she and her parents were. She watched while an SS officer put a gun to her father’s head and threatened to shoot him on the spot if he didn’t drop everything he was doing, leave his wife, leave his family, leave his job, and “volunteer” to fight in the German army. (Near the end of the war, they were becoming desperate to keep the ranks filled, ultimately making children and old people fight..)

The two SS officers that went into the apartment below theirs did the same thing. In that case, the father in the apartment below theirs was shot in the head, probably for begging not to be taken away from his family.

And to think people dare to show up at protests with a picture of their President photoshopped to look like Adolf Hitler, a man whose atrocities can never be put down in words.

Coming Between Doctor and Patient

Second, there is to be medical review boards that will provide guidelines for doctors on what type of treatment would be appropriate for their patient. Now some people argue that this would prevent doctors from fulfilling the Hipprocratic Oath – putting their patient’s well-being before anything else, because they will have to choose between doing what’s best for their patient and being sued or getting in trouble with the law somehow.

Bulls**t.

First, the guidelines provided are only SUGGESTIONS as to how the doctor COULD go about treating his or her patient. It is NOT a mandate of any sort. There is nothing that is going to come in between the doctor and his or her patient.
Second, are people that naive to think that ALL doctors are doing the best for their patients?

Massive medical fraud exposed: pharmaceutical company paid doctors to prescribe drugs and run sham clinical trials

The fact of the matter is that due to the private nature of many pharmaceutical firms and thus their profit driven nature, coupled with certain irresponsible doctors, the patient’s needs are often neglected for profit’s sake. There NEEDS to be something that oversees healthcare in the USA in order to ensure proper healthcare for all its people.

End-of-life planning = “death panels”

Third the whole idea of there being “death panels” which is apparently a panel of “bureaucrats can decide who dies” according to Sarah Palin. In essence , it encourages senior citizens to kick the bucket earlier?

People who suggest this have got to be illiterate, or they are willing to take Sarah Palin’s words for it (which is probably even worse than being illiterate).

What the bill actually does is pay doctors for voluntary consulting sessions with older patients to discuss end-of-life issues which include stuff like living wills, learning about hospices as an option for the terminally ill, facilitating emotional expression, allow doctors to appreciate the psychological state and the suffering which their patient is going through, etc. Because let’s face it, we’re all eventually going to die, and this bill incentivises doctors to assist patients in making plans for this eventuality.

Where in the world does it promote stuff like mercy killing or euthanasia? In fact, it would block funds for counselling that presents assisted suicide as an option for patients.

Oh and let’s not forget to mention that back in 2003 or 2004, the Republicans were in favour of a similar proposal which would help senior citizens pay for end-of-life counselling. But now that the same thing is being proposed, it suddenly becomes “death panels”.

Sheesh…

Start Being Rational… PLEASE

In my opinion, people who are busy shouting and screaming at those town hall meetings really need to start educating themselves about what everything here really means. Also, they should probably learn to not have the patience of a 10 year old, because they’re screaming questions at Representatives and Senators without even giving them the chance to answer their questions before continuing to shout. There are times when the speaker will simply tell them that they are misinformed about a certain portion of the bill, explain to them what that part of the bill is really about, and they just continue shouting.

I do wonder how this whole fiasco is going to end…

Why I love Project Natal

Project Natal Sensor XboxHonestly, there’s been so much hate going around about Natal, Microsoft’s 3D motion capturing system. Gamers are dismissing it as being gimmicky again, calling the Milo demonstration fake, etc. Before I go on to why I actually really love Natal, let me first discuss some of the criticism levelled against Natal.

Rebuttals

Gamers complain it’ll be too gimmicky. Fine, don’t use it then. It’s not like anyone’s forcing you to drop your controllers and get off your lazy ass to move about. But besides that, let me throw this question at you: Which motion controller isn’t going to seem “gimmicky”? The Wii’s been viewed as a gimmick since… forever, but it’s still pwning the other 2 consoles in terms of number of units moved. The kinds of stuff possible with Natal (at least the kind of stuff Mircosoft promises in its promo video) completely changes the landscape of games development.

Yes I know it isn’t true 1-to-1 motion capture as compared to the Playstation’s Blue Ball thingy, but come on, this thing hasn’t even hit the market yet. It’s still very much in development, and as technology improves we’ll (hopefully) one day see Natal have true 1-to-1 motion capture without you having to hold a single thing in your hand.

Also, let’s face it. Microsoft can throw a controller in if ever necessary for a particular game to have buttons, it’s not like Microsoft is going to restrict the gamer to ONLY using their body. The difference is that a controller won’t be compulsory for gaming like it always has been since… forever.

Now for the biggest argument against Project Natal: IT’S FAKE.

First, we’ve got an article claiming that the Milo demonstration video was fake because of the awkward positioning of “Claire’s” hands on screen as well as the fact that a ripple started in the virtual water before Claire started moving her hands. I’ve honestly re-watched that same exact few seconds at least 10 times over and honestly can’t notice that fact. To me, that article was just trying to diss Natal for the sake of it.

But besides that, has anyone bothered to consider WHY IN THE WORLD MICROSOFT WOULD BOTHER TO FAKE THE MILO DEMONSTRATION VIDEO? Here’re a few rebuttals:

  1. The part of the Milo video that was supposedly fake had to do with the motion capture. But there was NO other point in the “playing with water” scene where there were problems. But oh no, that split second couldn’t have been a glitch or a slight bug seeing as how the entire thing’s still a prototype, the entire video HAD to be fake.
  2. Besides, Microsoft demo-ed the motion capturing part of Natal live on stage with Ricochet, so why would they fake it in a video?!
  3. The most important point: THEY DEMO-ED IT TO A SELECT NUMBER OF PEOPLE. Why would they want to fake something, then open it up to others to come try it out?!

Not to mention Natal has actually received really positive feedback from some reputable gaming sites like IGN which simply said that Natal “works”. IGN even praised the build of Burnout that was developed to work with Natal and how it actually worked pretty smoothly. Oh and Milo isn’t fake at all according to them, he actually managed to make Milo laugh after telling him a joke. The only really negative feedback I’ve read about was from a PS3 site… need I say more?

MiloRPG full of Milo-like NPCs

Now let me sidetrack here and fantasise for a moment. If we can have a character as realistic as Milo now whom you can interact with simply by talking. Imagine, less than 10 years down the road we could actually have an entire RPG game full of millions of characters as interactive as Milo whom you could walk around and talk to instead of simply going up to them and hitting “A”.

But let’s all assume Natal actually sucks for games, there’s a whole area people aren’t thinking about:

What if Natal was implemented as a system.

There’re 3 parts in the Natal promo video I’m referring to:

  • the part where 2 girls have a video conference over a dress
  • the part where the dude scans in his skateboard
  • the final part where a girl waves her hands in the air to choose the movie to watch.

Now…

  • facial recognition, video conferencing, selecting the dress and being able to try it on a virtual model of yourself?
  • That not enough? How about scanning virtually anything in and having it become an interactive object?
  • The last part is so simple in itself yet so mind blowing that I don’t even know what to say about it… you control your TV by waving your hands. That’s like having magical powers for crying out loud.

Virtual butler at your service

Iron Man JarvisWe are THIS close to having Tony Stark’s computer “butler” Jarvis in our homes with such technology. All you gotta do is install speakers and sensors all around your home and make use of Natal accordingly and there you go. Jarvis can recognise each and every person in the house, for example by using cameras to judge the outline of your body and the silhouette it casts depending on the angle of the camera.

You can ask him practically anything with Milo’s “AI”. For example simple stuff like “What time is it?” or “Lock the door please”. You could even go “Help pass the message to Mom that I’m doing my school project up here please.” and Jarvis could search through the entire house with the cameras to find where Mom is and play back the message only using the speakers in that vicinity. Oh and Natal also has voice recognition (not just the words, but who the voice belongs to) so Jarvis will know who’s saying what at all times.

If you’re alone at home, you could make a phone call while walking around the entire house since there’ll be microphones everywhere and the opposite party’s voice will just play out of the speakers in the vicinity of wherever you’re walking since Jarvis can keep track of your movements.

Oh if you’re too lazy to open your mouth to switch on the lights, how bout just waving your hands in a certain gesture or something? Switching TV channels or radio stations by flicking your wrist. Maybe adjusting your fan speed by raising or lowering your hand? In fact, if you bother to install motors around your house, you could wave your hand and have ANYTHING happen. Close your door, draw the curtains, open drawers, etc. The possibilities are pretty much endless.

If only…

Of course, all this Jarvis stuff is pretty far off. It all depends on whether Microsoft actually delivers everything it has promised in the promo video for Natal. Some of the stuff probably isn’t even possible just with Natal’s technology. There’s also the problem of security of course, that someone could somehow hack into Jarvis and track your every movement. But as long as Jarvis is not connected to the internet at all times it helps quite a bit, then someone would have to hack into the internal network of Jarvis (eg. the signals a camera sends to the CPU), but IF everything was completely hardwired this probably wouldn’t be a problem at all.

As you can see, right now everything is an IF. But let me just say that I never expected to see a system like this in place in my lifetime, and I’m only 17. Now, with Natal, this might just be possible within the next 10 years.

Here’s hoping for a Jarvis system in my house.

Password must contain letters in mixed case and numbers

I’ve begun to realise that it’s becoming some sort of trend for sites that require registration to access to have really annoying rules for what your password should be like. I mean the usual rule is something along the lines of “between 6 – 15 characters” and they just leave it at that. But it seems that in recent times, it’s becoming more and more often that I’m met with a site that has this on their registration page:

Picture 4.png

Seriously? Is it really necessary to have such a secure password? I mean of course it depends on the context of when you apply such rules. If you’re a webhost and want your customers to make sure they have a secure enough password so that someone else won’t simply brute-force their way into the server and mess around inside, go right on ahead. You obviously need security for services like these. But for crying out loud I encountered that rule above when trying to register for a forum. Seriously? Is hacking into other people’s accounts such a big threat that such stringent rules are necessary? For such cases a simple ban/IP ban will do the job.

I know it seems like I’m making a big fuss over nothing, but my real question here is: What’s the point? You’re just unnecessarily adding another obstacle for users who want to get into your site and contribute to it. I’ve lost countless accounts in the past because I can’t remember what weird rule the site implemented for my password, and plenty of their “Recover Your Password” services don’t even work properly.

So please, site admins, if your site doesn’t require such a high level of security, don’t bother doing stupid stuff like this. Thanks.

FYI, the forum I was trying to register for was Quake-Live TV, the site which provides video with commentary of all the latest Quake Live Tournament matches. Anyone who’s interested in the game, please check it out!

So Susan Boyle Lost… Surprise much?

So the finals of Britain’s Got Talent (BGT) just aired last night and I finally finished watching all the finals performance videos. I must say, Britain’s certainly gotten it right this time. This is the exact order of the winners I would have chosen, namely,

1. Diversity

YouTube Preview Image

2. Susan Boyle

3. Julian Smith

Alas, in my opinion Julian Smith’s in there only because everyone wants him to win. He’s nowhere near as entertaining as the others are when it comes to performing on a big stage, especially when you come up to play an instrument just after everyone else has wowed the crowd with their singing and dancing and whatnot. However, there’s no doubt he’s good, and definitely deserving of the top 3.

Diversity’s biggest rivals in this competition have undoubtedly been Flawless, but they definitely saved the best for last. Amanda was right when she said Ashley’s (group leader) choreography is second to none. It’s probably the most entertaining choreography I’ve personally witnessed. While technically Flawless is way better than Diversity, overall Diversity just has that extra special something that makes them much more endearing and entertaining.

Now Susan Boyle on the other hand to me was way overrated. Don’t get me wrong, she’s an amazingly talented singer. But the kid, Jaheen Jafargholi, is as good a singer in my books. Yet Susan Boyle received so much more attention because her audition was aired in the first episode of Britain’s Got Talent with an amazing act and story. To me it played a huge part, and of course YouTube did its thing as it did when the net exploded with Signature’s performance during last year’s BGT.

Anyway, congrats to Diversity for a well deserved win.

And really, it’s funny how I’m a Singaporean yet thoroughly enjoy BGT. The hidden talent there is just pretty amazing, especially compared to Singapore’s population of 4 million, there’s barely any artistic talent here.

I’m serious… you should see what a joke Singapore Idol is…

 Page 1 of 3  1  2  3 »