— aka.spvn

Archive
Random Musings

So he interrupts Taylor Swift’s acceptance speech at the MTV awards, being completely disrespectful to her. I’d like to thank him for that. He has created one of the most popular catch phrases/memes for the rest of us to use. I mean, just take for example some of the stuff that’s been coming up:

kanye west 1.jpgkanye west 2.png

Pure genius.

Well, now even Obama thinks he’s a jackass. I’m not kidding, he made an off-the-record comment calling Kanye West a jackass. You gotta be pretty screwed up to have the President of the United States think you’re a jackass. And this is just a celebrity we’re talking about here. The President deals with things like terrorists, but he chooses to call Kanye West a jackass. :)

At first, I thought he was just drunk and high when he interrupted her. But he just went on Jay Leno’s new show not too long ago, and apologised. Well if you could call it an apology that is. This is part of what he said:

“It was just very rude, period,” West added. “I’d like to apologize to her in person.”

So far so good.

Leno brought back the subject of West’s late mother and asked him what she would have thought about the incident. West gave a good 20 seconds of pause before saying “Obviously, I deal with hurt, and so many celebrities, they never take the time off, and I never took the time off, really. I’ve really never taken the time off. It’s been music after music and tour after tour. And I’m just ashamed my hurt caused someone else hurt.”

Wait whut???

“Obviously, I deal with hurt, and so many celebrities, they never take the time off, and I never took the time off, really. I’ve really never taken the time off. It’s been music after music and tour after tour. And I’m just ashamed my hurt caused someone else hurt.”

What in the world is he trying to say?

“I deal with hurt” – err, do you always get stabbed or something?

“and so many celebrities, they never take the time off” – what does that have got to do with this “hurt” you speak of?

“I never took the time off… tour after tour” – therefore… you need to interrupt her speech?

“I’m just ashamed my hurt caused someone else hurt” – WHAT IS THIS “HURT”? Is it a code word?

Video of the interview below:

Post to Twitter

Read More

Fat Princess logoGames like Killzone 2, Gears of War, Halo, Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots, etc. are often touted as “games that sell consoles”. They are supposedly so amazing, both graphically as well as gameplay wise, that they’re supposed to convince people to buy one console or the other just to play these exclusive titles. The production values for such triple-A titles are even comparable with that of big-budget films, with voice-actors having to rehearse their lines multiple times, designers and animators making everything look as realistic as possible, programmers making turning all that into action-packed gameplay. Not to mention plenty of these titles easily have budgets that hit 8 digits (Killzone 2 had a budget of over US$40 million).

Yet the game that really makes me want to buy a PS3 is a little downloadable game on the Playstation Network called Fat Princess.

So simple, yet so fun

Released just 2 weeks ago, the game has been receiving rave reviews all around, being praised for its unique cartoon-ish style, team-based gameplay, and most importantly simply being a game that’s really really fun to play. For those who don’t know,  Fat Princess gives you kind of a top-down/isometric view of the battlefield, with online multiplayer that supports up to 32 players. You can switch to any of the 5 classes on the fly by simply choosing what hat to wear at your base. The goal of the game is kind of like a traditional CTF match, except in this case the “flag” you’ve got to bring back is really (as the name implies) a fat princess. The catch is that by feeding your own princess more cake, she gets fatter and thus your opponents move slower when carrying her, making it harder for them to capture her.

Why DotA is so damn popular

Fat Princess ScreenshotI’ve had my eyes on this game since it was first revealed at E3 2008, it instantly caught my attention thanks to its simple gameplay, yet extremely charming style. The thing that really won me over? Team-based gameplay. As any gamer who has played CTF matches in any FPS game will tell you, impeccable teamwork is of utmost importance if you want to succeed. Furthermore, the simple top-down view really nails it for me, because there’s just nothing more satisfying than watching your teammates running along right beside you as you all work towards the same goal. Thinking about it, this is probably what makes DotA so popular here in Asia:

  1. Simple objectives
  2. Team-based play with an eagle’s eye view of the battlefield

It’s the same case with Fat Princess. It’s just so satisfying to successfully complete a mission with your friends.

Why oh why aren’t there more games like that…

Fat Princess Screenshot 2It’s a real pity more developers don’t make games like that. The only other game I can think of which has similar components is another small, overlooked game called “Monster Madness: Battle for Suburbia”. It was simply a co-op game for up to 4 people where each character had a gun or two and you ran around shooting monsters up (with a top-down perspective of course). It just seemed so much fun to me, but unfortunately the PC port of the game was so bad that it rendered the game unplayable for me, which was a real pity.

If only…

If only more developers would create games with simple objectives, team-based gameplay, and a top-down view of the battlefield.

Or if only I had enough cash to buy a PS3…

Post to Twitter

Read More

It’s been long since I’ve updated here, I kinda lost the mood to write/blog for quite some time. Hope it doesn’t stay that way though.

Avatar The Last AirbenderOf course, the thing that’s been taking up most of my time over the past week or so has been Avatar: The Last Airbender. I just finished plowing through all 3 seasons which amounts to about 60 episodes. In retrospect, it’s pretty amazing that I actually watched the ENTIRE series in the first place, considering how I almost never finish watching ANY TV series in the first place, let alone a cartoon show.

I started watching Avatar after the show was repeatedly recommended by the hosts of the Totally Rad Show, and I thought I’d give it a shot. I heard about the show in the past, but paid little attention to it since it was a cartoon. That was until Dan made a really bold statement: “It’s as good as Star Wars”. I could hardly ignore it after hearing that.

Now, here I am, 60 episodes later, thinking that it isn’t exactly as good as Star Wars. In fact, I desperately wished this show wasn’t a cartoon aimed at children, but a more adult series. Because in a show where the main premise is that there are four nations at war, all of which have special powers to control the elements of fire, water, earth and air which they use to fight each other, the show is a lot less satisfying when not a SINGLE person in the entire series actually explicitly dies. I mean for crying out loud, there’s a fight scene in almost every single episode, yet no one ever dies. It just feels really weird to me…

Of course, a movie based on the show is in the works, due for release next year. But seriously, when you have a show that draws most of it’s inspiration from ancient Chinese culture, why in the world did the director (M. Night Shyamalan) cast every single role to a white kid? Even the main character, who’s a bald, Chinese monk, is played by a white kid? Seriously?

Besides that, from what I’ve seen thus far, The Last Airbender isn’t exactly shaping up to be a blockbuster movie. All the pictures I’ve seen of the filming thus far look really bad. Everything just doesn’t look and feel the way it’s supposed to be. Of course, all the footage that’s been released thus far has merely been a teaser trailer, and things could change a lot in a year of production, but I’m pretty nervous as to how the movie is going to turn out.

That being said, the TV series is probably one of the greatest stories ever told. The characters are all really well thought out and developed, and I really felt attached to every single one of them. The twists in the story are pretty cool and unexpected, and you’re always wondering what’s going to happen next. By the time you reach the third season, it’s like reading the last 200 pages of a Harry Potter book, you just don’t want to stop.

Post to Twitter

Read More

Or in this case power to the students…

In light of the ever increasing number of H1N1 cases in Singapore, Channelnews Asia is holding a poll on its site, asking what schools should do in such a situation.

The results are… staggering.

CNA Poll

Most of the 30K people who voted for holidays to be extended must have been students (including me).

I even got a chain SMS asking me to go to the site to vote in the poll. Whoever started it must be dreaming if he thinks a CNA poll has effect on governmental policies.

But of course, here’s hoping it does affect governmental policies… *crosses fingers*

For those who wanna vote in the poll, it’s located at http://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/index.htm

Post to Twitter

Read More

booksFirst, sorry for the lack of updates, have been feeling slightly under the weather recently.

So I came across this Facebook note which is basically a list of 100 books which BBC put together. Apparently the average number of books from this list that people have read is 6. I tried it out myself to disappointing results. Alas, I really have no idea how some people can suffer through some of these insanely long and difficult to read books. Still, I guess I have to start reading more older books… :(

Instructions:
1) Look at the list and put an ‘X’ after those you have read.
2) Add a ‘+’ to the ones you LOVE.
3) Tally your total at the bottom.

1 Pride and Prejudice – Jane Austen
2 The Lord of the Rings – JRR Tolkien (x First book and half of second book, couldn’t bring myself to read any further)
3 Jane Eyre – Charlotte Bronte
4 Harry Potter series – JK Rowling (X+++++++++++++++)
5 To Kill a Mockingbird – Harper Lee
6 The Bible
7 Wuthering Heights – Emily Bronte
8 Nineteen Eighty Four – George Orwell (X +++++++++)
9 His Dark Materials – Philip Pullman
10 Great Expectations – Charles Dickens (Read like the first 100-200 pages, got bored with it)
11 Little Women – Louisa M Alcott
12 Tess of the D’Urbervilles – Thomas Hardy
13 Catch 22 – Joseph Heller (Read the first few chapters, couldn’t stand it because it made no sense to me)
14 Complete Works of Shakespeare
15 Rebecca – Daphne Du Maurier
16 The Hobbit – JRR Tolkien (X)
17 Birdsong – Sebastian Faulk
18 Catcher in the Rye – JD Salinger
19 The Time Traveller’s Wife – Audrey Niffenegger
20 Middlemarch – George Eliot
21 Gone With The Wind – Margaret Mitchel (was intimidated by the length)
22 The Great Gatsby – F Scott Fitzgerald
23 Bleak House – Charles Dickens
24 War and Peace – Leo Tolstoy (well, I read Peace & War by Joe Haldeman and loved it, does that count? :P )
25 The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy – Douglas Adams
26 Brideshead Revisited – Evelyn Waugh
27 Crime and Punishment – Fyodor Dostoyevsky
28 Grapes of Wrath – John Steinbeck
29 Alice in Wonderland – Lewis Carroll (x I think I did read it at least, must have at one point in time)
30 The Wind in the Willows – Kenneth Grahame
31 Anna Karenina – Leo Tolstoy
32 David Copperfield – Charles Dickens
33 Chronicles of Narnia – CS Lewis
34 Emma – Jane Austen
35 Persuasion – Jane Austen
36 The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe – CS Lewis
37 The Kite Runner – Khaled Hussein
38 Captain Corelli’s Mandolin – Louis De Bernieres
39 Memoirs of a Geisha – Arthur Golden
40 Winnie the Pooh – AA Milne
41 Animal Farm – George Orwell (X)
42 The Da Vinci Code – Dan Brown
43 One Hundred Years of Solitude – Gabriel Garcia Marquez
44 A Prayer for Owen Meany – John Irving
45 The Woman in White – Wilkie Collins
46 Anne of Green Gables – LM Montgomery
47 Far From The Madding Crowd – Thomas Hardy
48 The Handmaid’s Tale – Margaret Atwood
49 Lord of the Flies – William Golding
50 Atonement – Ian McEwan
51 Life of Pi – Yann Martel
52 Dune – Frank Herbert (Really wanted to read this one, but the need to read the appendix in order to understand this science fiction put me off)
53 Cold Comfort Farm – Stella Gibbons
54 Sense and Sensibility – Jane Austen
55 A Suitable Boy – Vikram Seth
56 The Shadow of the Wind – Carlos Ruiz Zafon

57 A Tale Of Two Cities – Charles Dickens (x) 58 Brave New World – Aldous Huxley
59 The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time – Mark Haddon
60 Love In The Time Of Cholera – Gabriel Garcia Marquez
61 Of Mice and Men – John Steinbeck
62 Lolita – Vladimir Nabokov
63 The Secret History – Donna Tartt
64 The Lovely Bones – Alice Sebold
65 Count of Monte Cristo – Alexandre Dumas
66 On The Road – Jack Kerouac
67 Jude the Obscure – Thomas Hardy
68 Bridget Jones’s Diary – Helen Fielding
69 Midnight’s Children – Salman Rushdie
70 Moby Dick – Herman Melville
71 Oliver Twist – Charles Dickens
72 Dracula – Bram Stoker
73 The Secret Garden – Frances Hodgson Burnett
74 Notes From A Small Island – Bill Bryson (I read Notes From an Even Smaller Island by Neil Humphreys on Singapore, brilliant book for any Singaporean IMO).
75 Ulysses – James Joyce
76 The Bell Jar – Sylvia Plath
77 Swallows and Amazons – Arthur Ransome
78 Germinal – Emile Zola
79 Vanity Fair – William Makepeace Thackeray
80 Possession – AS Byatt
81 A Christmas Carol – Charles Dickens
82 Cloud Atlas – David Mitchell
83 The Color Purple – Alice Walker
84 The Remains of the Day – Kazuo Ishiguro
85 Madame Bovary – Gustave Flaubert
86 A Fine Balance – Rohinton Mistry
87 Charlotte’s Web – E.B. White
88 The Five People You Meet In Heaven – Mitch Albom (X++++++++++++++)
89 Adventures of Sherlock Holmes – Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
90 The Faraway Tree Collection – Enid Blyton
91 Heart of Darkness – Joseph Conrad
92 The Little Prince – Antoine De Saint-Exupery
93 The Wasp Factory – Iain Banks
94 Watership Down – Richard Adams
95 A Confederacy of Dunces – John Kennedy Toole
96 A Town Like Alice – Nevil Shute
97 The Three Musketeers – Alexandre Dumas
98 Hamlet – William Shakespeare
99 Charlie and the Chocolate Factory – Roald Dahl (x++++++)
100 Les Miserables – Victor Hugo (Read the first 100 pages, don’t understand how anyone could suffer through the entire book)

Post to Twitter

Read More

Black Bicycle CardsSo I’ve got a one week break from school now, and thus far the majority of my time has been spent with cards in my hand. Just regular old playing cards, but I’ve been practising like mad to try and make them do interesting magical stuff. It sure isn’t easy, and you really gain inspiration from those masters of card magic on Youtube. In fact, if anyone knows of a great close-up card magician whose performances are widely available on Youtube, please leave their name in the comments, I’ve personally only been watching Bill Malone.

Now, my obsession with magics starts with and ends with playing cards. They’re really the only form of tricks I’d bother learning and practising. They might not be the most effective form of magic, but they’re still the most believable. Most other close up magic requires gimmicks that won’t hold up to inspection, but cards are more or less the only thing with which you can make wonders occur but yet make them seem like completely oridinary cards.

That being said, it sure is hard work (as with everything else) to be able to do any trick well. It will reach a point where your hands will even start to hurt from handling the cards too much. Alas, I have no choice but to keep practising. Thank goodness I’m only doing it for this week.

I’ve even gone to great lengths to purchase new decks for the fun of it. I really think collecting playing cards could become a hobby of some sort, what with all the cool styles ellusionist keeps churning out. From transparent ones, to black ones, to plastic ones, etc.

Enough typing for now, time to go back to practising.

Post to Twitter

Read More

firefoxSo I booted up my computer today, tried to launch Firefox and was greeted by the Update window. Without thinking twice, I hit update and even skipped past the part where they told me some of my plugins would no longer work. I never really bothered to check that list because most of the plugins I have are disabled and the ones I actually use are the ones that are always updated because they’re used by everyone.

Unfortunately, I had completely forgotten about one of the plugins I use everyday called keyconfig. What it basically allows you to do is quickly change the keyboard shortcuts used within Firefox. There’s been a long standing bug with Firefox on the Mac whereby it doesn’t allow you to change any keyboard shortcuts from withihe System Preferences as every other program does.

For some strange reason, the moment I restarted Firefox with 3.0.7 installed, my keyboard shortcuts were acting weird, and it suddenly hit me that keyconfig no longer worked, which I found really strange. Why would a plugin not work after a simple 0.0.1 update? Turns out there was more to that tiny update than a usual minor update. So here’s a warning to anyone:

DO NOT UPDATE FIREFOX TO 3.0.7 IF YOU’RE ON A MAC AND USE THE PLUGIN “KEYCONFIG” AS IT WILL NOT WORK AFTERWARDS.

For those of you thinking “it’s no big deal”, ask around and you’ll find out how crucial keyboard shortcuts are to some of us. It really speeds things up even for the simplest tasks.

All in all, I have no idea why Firefox 3.0.7 causes this to happen on Macs, but Mozilla really has to fix this soon :(

Post to Twitter

Read More

Coverflow in Safari 4 Beta

Let’s face it, Apple has always been obsessed with being as sleek as possible when it comes to their hardware and providing as much eyecandy as possible when it comes to their software. They have a knack for introducing products that will Wow the public while making Mac lovers drool over the most recently overpriced product they released.

Thus, it was hardly surprising when Apple purchased Coverflow from an independent artist back in 2006. Coverflow was originally an additional plugin to iTunes, which did exactly the same thing it does today: showcase your album art in a very stylish and sleek form, precisely what Apple loves. When Apple first bought it, all they initially did was make it a default feature in iTunes, but as time went by, they tried to introduce Coverflow to anything and everything.

Everytime I watched Steve Jobs introduce a new product or iPod at keynotes in recent years, he’d always reach the part where he shows off Coverflow for the umpteenth time. Everytime he tries to wow everyone with it, I’m busy cringing in front of my computer screen going, “Not this stupid thing again…”

The truth of the matter is that Coverflow is nothing more than a gimmick. I use it for like 5 seconds now and then just to scroll through all my album art really really fast, because it really does seem cool! For literally 5 seconds that is, after which I imeediately switch back to the much more functional list view.

And now, with the latest beta version of Safari, Apple’s default web browser for the Mac, they’ve done the unthinkable: shoehorning Coverflow into a web browser.

This really is the last straw.

Does Apple REALLY expect people to use it to browse through the history of the sites they’ve browsed? Personally, I almost never look at my history, except when I need to go back to a site whose URL I forgot on the rare occasion, I’ll do a quick search and be done with it.

What does Apple expect us to do? Get bored with web surfing and so we turn to surfing through our history for the fun of it?

Get real. Practically no one uses Coverflow on their iPods or iTunes, where we actually get to see some pretty cool album art fly by. But honestly? Watching snapshots of websites fly by? Nu-uh, not for me.

Post to Twitter

Read More

facebook-logoA few weeks or so ago, Facebook suddenly decided to update, or rather revise, their Terms of Service. I won’t bother to copy what they added here, since it’s written in lengthy, complicated, and downright anal terms-of-use-language (ie. they use 3 sentences to reiterate the same thing and 10 different “synonyms” of sorts to make sure they cover every single aspect they want to). Basically, they added a few paragraphs which explicitly stated that Facebook owned whatever content you uploaded (pictures, videos, etc.) and could do whatever they wanted to do with it (which was where they had to use 10+ words to describe what they could do with it), even if you deleted your account!!!

*Panic and chaos ensues*

Seriously people, since when has social networking sites like Facebook/Friendster NOT owned your photos. You upload them to their server so that your friends can view them, hasn’t it ever occured to you that you’re granting them the license to display these images to the public in the first place? Even if they decided to sell your media to other companies or whatsoever, do you really think you would have heard about it? Besides, a majority of the media uploaded on Facebook is usually personal pictures and videos of friends and family, who would gain much from your 10th grade picture of you crying or whatever?

Nevertheless, there was a huge outcry all over the internet. Fueled by the annoymity of internet usernames, people with nicknames along the lines of DeathSlayer28 and PwettyGurl82 were busy growing balls of steel and telling Facebook to go “burn and die”. Everyone started thinking Facebook would really want to steal their unglam pictures and videos to sell to marketting companies or something. It seems like everyone never realised that things have been like that all along, since by uploading the pictures to Facebook and letting all your friends view them you’re basically granting them the license to do a hell lot with your media anyway.

Despite the founder of Facebook himself (Mark SZuckerberg) clarifying things in this blog post dated Febrary 17th, stating about how Facebook requires such a license to be allowed to publicise your media, Facebook has ultimately decided to revert to it’s old ToS for now… which doesn’t really make much of a difference really. According to this other blog post that Zuckerberg posted roughly 24 hours before the previous one, he stated that Facebook is reverting back to the original ToS while they craft out a new one that will explain more clearly what they meant by having control over people’s media. They only updated the ToS in the first place to make it clearer as to what control they had over the media.

The thing is, all Facebook users (like myself) can do is to trust them. I mean we’re giving away all our personal information to a completely foreign website, there’s really no guarentee that they’re not selling off our information under the table without anyone knowing. When it comes to the internet, one really has no choice but to trust whatever site you’re giving away your information to. All in all, there’s really no point in whining about it.

At least Facebook is willing to do something about it and are listening to what its users have to say.

Post to Twitter

Read More

Windows Live Hotmail LogoBack in the day even before Gmail came along, (then) Hotmail was probably the most popular email solution for home users and basically anyone who wanted a free email account. Then Gmail came along and messed everything up for them. Thus, since 2005, Microsoft has been busy trying to revamp Hotmail, for example through things like more disk space. It’s hard to imagine that there was a time when Hotmail users had 25mb while Gmail users had 1GB, but that was the case when Gmail was first introduced.

Sure Hotmail managed to revamp it’s interface recently, but honestly, it’s nowhere near what Gmail has. The top quarter of the screen is filled up with huge banner advertisements and links no one cares about to other areas of Windows Live. Even the interface itself just doesn’t feel as snappy or as clean as Gmail’s interface. No doubt though, it was a step in the right direction.

Still, for some strange reason, Hotmail never provided free POP3 access. For the uninitiated, it means that Hotmail users couldn’t view their email through external 3rd-party email clients like Thunderbird or Outlook or whatnot. The ONLY way to view your email was to navigate through the site’s horrible online interface. In comparison, Gmail provided such access from the get go in 2004.

However, only this year, in 2009, is Microsoft finally playing the catch-up game. They just announced POP3 access for Brazil and US users, along with access for Europe and UK users which they’ve been working on since January. Honestly, Microsoft needed 5 years (after Gmail was introduced) to introduce such a fundamental feature? Sure it was present in the past, but one had to pay just to be able to read his/her email wherever they wanted to. Even after Gmail came along in 2004 and made free POP3 access an “industry standard” so to speak, Microsoft never took the hint to introduce that same feature, hence they’ve watched their users steadily switch over to Gmail one by one.

It seems like I’ll be sticking with Gmail as well, seeing as how they haven’t even provided POP3 access for Asian users. In fact, this lack of POP3 access is one of the biggest reasons why I don’t use Hotmail anymore. At the time of this writing, I have exactly 146 unread email messages in my inbox. Though I’ve got to check it from time to time because some people still email me at my Hotmail account, it goes to show how little I bother about it anymore.

Not to mention Microsoft might be doing too little, too late. If they took 5 years to introduce POP3 access, one can only wonder when they’ll finally be able to introduce an interface I’d actually bother to use, because half the time it doesn’t even work properly with Mozilla Firefox, which is my (as well as many other people’s) primary browser.

In my opinion, we could probably see Microsoft closing down Hotmail eventually.

Post to Twitter

Read More