— aka.spvn

Archive
Tag "itunes"

There’ve always been “music discovery services” floating around the Internet for years now. In all honesty, I haven’t found a single one of them that can accurately provide me with songs that I enjoy. Most of them usually ask you to name one or a couple of songs that you already like, then they’ll suggest other “similar” songs. From there, you have to manually tell the service whether you like or hate each and every song they throw at you to give them a better idea of what kinds of music to filter and present to you. What a hassle to begin with.

But it doesn’t work like that

The problem with this approach is that they’re taking a very scientific approach to music discovery. Oh, you like an R&B song? Well let’s play more R&B for you. The problem is that music doesn’t work like that. Just because you liked a particular R&B song doesn’t mean you’ll like all other R&B songs. You might have liked that first song because you liked the unique beat it had, or the unique vocals of that particular song. The fact that it was an R&B song was just a coincidence. But these “music discovery services” don’t know that. To the algorithm, both songs are tagged as R&B, so you should like both songs, right?

Of course, I’m over simplifying here. I’m sure there are many other algorithms that go into determining whether a particular song would be to your liking. But the fact remains that discovering music isn’t a scientific endeavour, but rather an intuitive one. That’s what’s so brilliant about Apple’s Genius feature. It relies on the intuition of other humans to decide what songs to suggest to you.

A little history…

For those who don’t know, Genius is a feature Apple introduced into iTunes all the way back in 2008. It’s s system that suggests songs to you based on what you already have in your library. Plenty of people saw this and immediately dismissed Genius as another way for Apple to sell you more songs from their iTunes Store. However, it goes way further than that. Genius also allows you to create playlists from your library based of off any one particular song. The genius (pun intended) of this feature and the factor that sets it apart from most other music discovery services is that instead of basing the suggestions off of the song’s descriptors, it bases it off of who else listens to that song as well, and what other songs they have in their library that you have as well. Once they find these common denominators, it’ll put it together into a playlist. The basic idea is:

Oh, both you and these 100 other users here listen to this particular song. And you have these 24 other songs that can also be found in the library of these 100 other users. I’ll put them all together into a 25 song playlist for you!

Of course once again I’m over simplifying and there are other algorithms at play here (e.g. For starters the 24 other songs they put in will most likely be the 24 most common songs among these 100 users, and they probably won’t suggest Heavy Metal songs when you chose a Pop song), but that’s the gist of how Genius works, and more importantly why it works so much better than other music discovery services.

“It just works!”

Genius is one of those Apple products that follows their mantra of “it just works”. Whenever I generate a Genius playlist, the other songs included in the playlist are oftentimes from vastly different artists, and even slightly different genres. However, for some strange reason, when I’m in the mood for that particular song I chose to build my playlist around, I will also be in the mood to listen to the other 24 songs that Genius chose for me. It works so well for me that I’ve more or less abandoned manually creating playlists because I completely rely on Genius to put playlists together for me.

Y U NO USE THIS FEATURE

And yet, despite being such a useful (and free) feature that’s included with iTunes, a surprising number of people actually don’t even know about it or use it at all. To be honest Apple didn’t even really advertise Genius much. They seemed to have made an even greater effort when it came to Ping, their attempt at a social network based around music. That turned out to be a huge flop, and rightfully so. Apple didn’t seem to realise that the last thing people wanted was another social network profile to maintain. Not to mention it hardly did anything out of the ordinary to justify their users spending time on it.

In comparison, Genius is a feature that actually works and is actually useful. Unfortunately the only problem is that few people outside of those who know the ins and outs of iTunes+iPod actually know of it at all. A problem that really needs to be rectified.

Post to Twitter

Read More

Apple LogoAt roughly 4am or so in the morning (Singapore time of course), Apple held what was going to be its final Macworld keynote. After more than 2 decades of releasing its brand new products at what is arguably the world’s largest Mac convention, it has finally decided that 2009 will be the last time they’ll participate in Macworld.

So I booted up my computer early this morning, hoping to hear about some great new stuff Apple was going to introduce, considering how this was going to be their last year and they’d want to go out with a big bang. At first, things seemed pretty cool, but I realised how boring the whole keynote was going to be halfway through.

Phill’s first and last Macworld keynote

Before I get into the keynote though, there’s one thing I want to say about Phil Schiller. In every single Macworld keynote in the past, Steve Jobs has always been the one to give the keynote. No matter how big or small the new products were, every single Mac fan couldn’t wait to watch Steve Jobs unveil it. So it was quite surprising that he wasn’t going to be doing it this year, instead handing it over to Phil Schiller. I have to say, the first few minutes Phil stepped on stage and began talking about how successful Apple stores all over the world were doing, he seemed, of all things, nervous, even as the crowd applauded his every announcement. I suddenly realised the reason why this small emotion was so starking, because this never happened with Steve Jobs. Steve basked in the audience’s applause, encouraged by it, and you could almost see his face glow with glee everytime the crowd applauded. It almost seemed like the same smugness and glow that he had at 1984′s Macworld when he introduced the first ever Macintosh. Alas, things were different with Phil. You could just tell he was a much more humble person on stage, accepting the crowd’s applause, but not exactly basking in it like Jobs usually does. After a few minutes though, he no longer had much of a problem of “stage fright” and did a pretty good job on stage.

As for the keynote itself? Here’re roughly a list of things Apple introduced:

  • iLife ’09
    • iPhoto ’09 has new features like face recognition and support for geotagging so you can organise photos according to where you take them
    • iMovie ’09 builds upon last year’s (terrible) version of iMovie, adding new features that’ll hopefully make it a more robust movie editing software (hopefully as good as iMovie ’06).
    • Instructional videos in Garageband that teach you how to play instruments. Extra $5 videos are sold where various artists teach you how to play simplified versions of their songs.
    • Apparently updated versions of iDVD and iWeb as well, but were not covered in keynote
  • iWork ’09
    • Pages has a new fullscreen view (ala WriteRoom), ability to sync tables with Numbers, so when you edit the table in Numbers, it will update the same one in Pages as well, dynamic outline feature similar to the sidebar you’d see in Microsoft Powerpoint and Keynote
    • Keynote has new transitions, plus “Magic Move”, which is really cool. You set up your 2 slides, and Keynote automatically transitions them for you using advanced transitions that wouldn’t be possible manually. Some new themes and charts, etc.
    • Keynote Remote, an application for iPod Touch/iPhones. Control slides via Wifi, advance slides by swiping, can even view next slide/presenter notes.
    • Numbers has new formulas/functions for more advanced users, table categories to organise tables by a certain column, etc.
  • iWork.com
    • an online portal that’s in beta stage for now. Users can upload documents and have others collaborate on the same document by sending them emails. Sound familiar? (I’ll get to that in a moment)
  • 17″ Macbook Pro
    • Unibody, plus all the standard stuff you’d expect in a Macbook Pro now. 3 USB ports, one Firewire 800 port. Up to 2.93 Intel Core 2 Duo, up to 8GB RAM, GeForce 9600M GT graphics card, etc.
    • The biggest thing? 8 hour battery life. Yeah, EIGHT hours.
  • iTunes
    • Songs now priced at $0.69, $0.99, $1.29. Obviously, older songs are going to be priced at $0.69 while new releases at $1.29.
    • All songs eventually going to be DRM-free (Hooray!), must pay to “upgrade” them and remove DRM (rip-off).
    • Download songs through 3G on iPhone

Macbook Pro

And… that’s it. Zero hardware updates, no earth shattering announcements (except perhaps 8 hours battery life). The most interesting things were probably the 8 hour battery life, Keynote Remote and iPhoto’s nifty new features. If your more interesting announcements are your very first announcement and an iPhone app that you cover for 2 minutes, you know your keynote is boring.

It seems like the market agreed as well, seeing as how Apple’s stock dipped slightly immediately following the keynote, which is to be expected I guess, considering how lackluster their FINAL keynote at Macworld was. The biggest announcement was probably the 8 hour battery life, which is really something to boast about. Hopefully this will force other laptop manufacturors to research batteries which have longer battery lives.

Other than that, the rest of the keynote was pretty lackluster. But 2 announcements really stand out as major letdowns: iWork.com and DRM free music.

Pay for Google Documents?

iWork and iLife

Honestly, I can’t imagine how many people will be willing to actually PAY for iWork.com. Phill stated that it’s currently free as it’s in open beta, but apparently it’s going to become a paid service when it’s out of beta, which is just stupid. Why? Because Google Documents has been offering the same service for ages now, for free. Sure, you can’t leave comments, and don’t have a “chatbox” in the sidebar with Google Documents, but that’s hardly a big deal, knowing how Apple will charge some exorbidant  fee for iWork eventually. Not to mention you can actually EDIT the documens (within the browser as well) using Google Docs while you can only leave notes/comments for others in iWork.com. And am I really the only one who noticed that you can’t even scroll through the whole document in iWork.com? You have to select the individual pages in the sidebar and thus can only view one page at a time. The only way to see the next page is to click on it in the sidebar instead of simply scrolling down. What kind of UI design is that?!

Pay to do what you want with YOUR music?

As for the new DRM free music, it’s really a waste of time. According to Apple, people who shop on the iTunes store have to PAY more just to get rid of DRM? Meaning they have to pay more just so that they can do whatever they want with a file they’ve already bought? What kind of logic is that?! Furthermore, many users’ libraries aren’t small, and at 30 cents per song (just to “upgrade” them), it amounts to a few hundred dollars for some users to get rid of the annoying DRM. Why we users have to pay more just to do what we want with a song is beyond me.

All in all, it’s sad to see Apple go out on a low note at their last ever Macworld keynote. We were all really expecting something more. Alas, it seems we’ll have to wait awhile longer for major annoucements. It’s just such a shame that Apple’s final Macworld keynote will go down in history as one of its most boring and disappointing ones.

And on a random note, seems like the Silent Keynote campaign was a  complete failure, considering how the crowd cheered at every small announcement.

Post to Twitter

Read More